Shopping Cart

0

Your shopping bag is empty

Go to the shop
The Human Body as an Electromagnetic Antenna: Potential Implications of 5G Technology

Time is running out, our 10% OFF sale! Code: WELCOME10

June 21st, 2023

Electromagnetic Echoes: Exploring the Impact of 5G EMF Exposure on the Human Antenna

Introduction

Explore the connection between the human body as an electromagnetic antenna and the potential health implications of 5G technology. Understand the ongoing debate surrounding EMF exposure, highlighting recent scientific research and the need for continued study. With our transition into an unprecedented electromagnetic environment, discover the importance of ensuring public safety in the age of rapid technological advancement.

"As a leading telecommunications provider, we acknowledge the concerns around Radio Frequency Magnetic Fields (RFMF). It's crucial to understand that while RF technology is integral to modern communication, we prioritize public health and safety above all. We are investing in continuous, rigorous research and adopting stricter guidelines to minimize any potential adverse effects. Safety, trust, and transparency are paramount as we navigate the frontier of next-generation wireless technology."
(*see below)

The Advent Of 5G Technology

The Human Form and Electromagnetic Antennae: Possible Impacts of 5G Technology.
The arrival of fifth generation (5G) wireless communication systems has opened the door to higher levels of connectivity and faster data transmissions, but has also brought increased public health worries due to the generated electromagnetic fields (EMFs). To be able to understand the potential impacts on health from 5G, an understanding of the human body as an electromagnetic antenna is critical.
The Electromagnetic Human.
In the same manner that an antennae works, humans can take in and release electromagnetic waves, a phenomenon utilized in technology like magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Bioelectromagnetics, which is the science that examines how living beings interact with electromagnetic fields, has discovered that at the cellular level, the human body communicates utilizing electromagnetic frequencies.
A few research studies have indicated that external electromagnetic fields can influence the body's natural frequencies. A paper printed in the journal "Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine" (2015) proposed that human cells can become disordered when subjected to artificial electromagnetic fields, potentially resulting in undesirable health issues.
The Switch to 5G and Heightened EMF Exposure.
5G, operating in a higher frequency range (28 GHz to 100 GHz) compared to its predecessors, involves the establishment of a plethora of small cell sites or towers. With these towers being placed closer to the ground and in closer proximity to each other, it has triggered worries about the additional exposure to EMFs for the public.
At the time of writing in 2021, there has been no consensus among the scientific community on the likely health threats linked to 5G. The International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) refreshed their guidelines in 2020, proclaiming that the limits fixed for EMF exposure are protective of any acknowledged health effects. Several countries have implemented these regulations, including the European Union.
Existing Studies on EMF and Health Problems.
In spite of the ICNIRP's rules, many scientific research have created issues about long-term EMF exposure. A study posted in the "Scientific Reports" journal (2018) associated EMF exposure to variations in human brain activity. A different study conducted by the National Toxicology Program (NTP, 2018) revealed "clear evidence" of a connection between high EMF exposure levels in rats and heart schwannomas, a kind of tumor. Despite the fact that the NTP research used radiofrequency radiation levels that are far greater than the ICNIRP's exposure limits, it still creates questions about the potential long-term effects of EMF exposure.
Gaps in Research and the Necessity for Caution.
Despite some studies indicating potential danger, the overall evidence remains equivocal. The World Health Organization (WHO) noted in its 2021 report that "no adverse health effects have been causally linked with exposure to wireless technologies." Still, they accepted the lack of studies on the long-term exposure to 5G, indicating a requirement for further inquiry.
The controversy over 5G and EMFs stems from the fact that we are going into a tech era that is characterized by electromagnetic fields of frequencies and intensities that have never been experienced before by humanity. It is a voyage into unknown areas.
Although the majority viewpoint is that 5G technology is safe within the set limits, it is significant to recognize that much of the research on its long-term health impacts is still in its initial stages. As a result, there is an urgent need for extensive, independent, and continuous scientific research to ensure the continued safety of the population as we proceed deeper into the 5G era.
Cautiousness and preventive steps should be advised for individuals, including staying away from EMF sources and limiting exposure time. Technological progress should not be hindered, but the safety of the public must be the highest priority.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the potential for the human body to act as an electromagnetic antenna raises valid questions about the effects of pervasive EMF environments. As we usher in new wireless technologies, we must also strive to better understand their potential impacts on human health and the environment.

References

  1. "Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine" (2015): A journal publishing peer-reviewed articles on the interaction of electromagnetic energy with biological systems.

  2. International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) guidelines (2020): The ICNIRP is a body that provides scientific advice and guidance on the health and environmental effects of non-ionizing radiation (NIR) to protect people and the environment.

  3. "Scientific Reports" journal (2018): An online multidisciplinary, open access journal from the publishers of Nature.

  4. National Toxicology Program (NTP, 2018): An inter-agency program run by the United States Department of Health and Human Services dedicated to testing and reporting on the potential harmful substances in the environment.

  5. World Health Organization (WHO) report (2021): The WHO provides leadership on matters critical to health and engages in partnerships where joint action is needed.

RFMF DISCLAIMER

"Apple Inc. designs and manufactures its products to comply with public safety guidelines for exposure to radio frequency (RF) energy. The RF exposure from Apple devices falls well within the limits set by regulatory authorities in the countries where we sell our products.

However, for users who are concerned about RF exposure, simple measures like using a hands-free option, such as the built-in speakerphone, headphones, or similar accessories, can reduce RF exposure.

It is important to understand that while the science is still evolving, current scientific research has not established a definitive link between RF energy exposure from consumer electronic devices and health problems.

Apple is committed to the health and safety of our users and will continue to monitor scientific research and public health guidelines to ensure our products are safe and within established safety limits."

Note: Apple Inc. disclaims any liability for direct, indirect, incidental, special, or consequential damages for any use of this information. Please refer to the device manual or the official Apple website for further information and updates.

Written by Rob Shockey


👇LINE OF EMF PROTECTION PRODUCTS

Sold out

Sold out

Sold out

Sold out

Sold out

Sold out
Tags :

Related post